Comments on: Dog The Bounty Hunter - A Hero

By: azn

azn — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:28:45 +0000

are u guys dumb? hows dog a hero or wat he does any good? he bails criminals out of jail so they can be back on the streets and when they jump bail he goes and catches them so he can get his bail money back. hows he helping people again?

By: Pig Bennis

Pig Bennis — Sat, 02 May 2009 18:16:29 +0000

” I’ve captured over 7,000 fugitives and maybe it’s because I know how they think. I mean, if I wouldn’t have been doing what I’m doing, there’s 7,000 people who would have gotten away and how many victims would they leave behind?”

“I mean, just because they’re convicted of a felony one time in your life, you can’t just dump them and they’re scum forever.”

By: Pig Bennis

Pig Bennis — Sat, 02 May 2009 18:11:58 +0000

A convicted felon that has done more to help his country than most will ever do in theire lifetimes, he may be about the peso’s but who is more qualified to maybe just maybe make these convicted felons repent, and turn their life’s around just like he himself did back in the days. Lifes a bit*h aint it your their living you life and this convicted felon’s making millions. Or maybe its your sour unambiguous sense of living thats left you in the situation you are in, its people like you who should take a seat on the electric chair, the ones that do nothing for society and take up valuable oxygen.

By: clint petty

clint petty — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:00:42 +0000

You give someone a break, not a brake. You are a complete idiot. This guy is a convicted felon, which is why this cop-wannabe carries mace. Find another hero, you homo-repressed moron.

By: Ubu Walker

Ubu Walker — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:59:27 +0000

@Charles Riter
Wikipedia has a number of problems, most of them stemming from the fact that it is an encyclopedia. And encyclopedias aren’t meant to be a primary sources for papers.

However, IMHO, they are legitimate for quick and dirty discussions on forums like this to give background on facts that might otherwise be unknown.

When I use wikipedia, I look at an entry, and then look at the source. So, in this case, with the accusations against Dog, the source of the wikipedia reports are from a FOX news interview with the Dog himself who says that he was convicted of 1st Degree Murder but as an accessory. That seems pretty accurate to me: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,292383,00.html

I support wikipedia’s policy of not being able to edit information about oneself. For the main reason is that a) it is self serving and b) original research isn’t allowed.

By: Charles Riter

Charles Riter — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:10:38 +0000

Who can honestly take Wikipedia seriously? Behind the scenes are the controllers (webmasters & co.) who allow or retract info at their convenience. Ask Michael Rivero. He wasn’t allowed to edit false information about himself. Then, when he pointed out that he was in fact Michael Rivero, the articles were deleted. Further attempts to create new articles by his readers were consistently blocked. Go ahead and see how important a man he is, then do his search on Wiki. People, please look into facts; meaning, don’t rely on Wikipedia. We people deserve the truth, not hidden agendas.

By: texapino

texapino — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:53:43 +0000

yeah go dog!!!…**** his son…he deserves to be back in jail

By: Ubu Walker

Ubu Walker — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:16:53 +0000

@NightHunter
You are the one sowing hate in this thread. During this whole internet conversation, I have not once lowered myself to a personal attack against another poster. Calling out Dog’s racism isn’t hate mongering…it is doing what any American who loves his country should do, which is try to heal the racial divisiveness in this country. Insinuating that I smoke crack and calling me a scumbag is just juvenile name calling, and you should be ashamed of yourself.
BTW, I’m happy that Dog has his show back, I am a big believer in forgiveness, especially since Dog has said that he has taken on the responsibility of being a racial healer for our country, at least according to Roy Innis.

By: NightHunter

NightHunter — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:08:37 +0000

Well, since new “Dog The Bounty Hunter” episodes are being taped as I write this, and also since Tucker Chapman has been tossed back into the slammer for violating his parole (as his dad was afraid he’d do!) it shows that justice is alive and well!! Karma sure is a beautiful thing!!!

I guess that nut-job Ubu Walker must be crying all over his crack pipe now!!

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!

*That was me and the Dog having the last laugh Ubu Walker, you hate mongering scumbag!

DOG RULES!!!!!!!!!!!

By: mark

mark — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:19:57 +0000

Oh sorry Ubu Walker, If accessory to murder were murder then they would call it murder and it would carry the same punishment or sentencing.

You know about the reform its kinda like we used to say in gradshcool it takes one to know one. In fact the bad actors from my childhood mostly grew up to be cops of some form or other.